Parent Layer:
Gulf of Alaska
Name: Probability of Sea Whip Presence
Display Field:
Type: Raster Layer
Geometry Type: null
Description: Deep-sea coral and sponge ecosystems are widespread throughout most of Alaska's marine waters, and are associated with many different species of fishes and invertebrates. These ecosystems are vulnerable to the effects of commercial fishing activities and climate change. This work compared four commonly used species distribution models (general linear models, generalized additive models, boosted regression trees and random forest models) and an ensemble model to predict the presence or absence and abundance of six groups of benthic invertebrate taxa in the Gulf of Alaska. All four model types performed adequately on training data for predicting presence and absence, with regression forest models having the best overall performance measured by the area under the receiver-operating-curve (AUC). The models also performed well on the test data for presence and absence with average AUCs ranging from 0.66 to 0.82. For the test data, ensemble models performed the best. For abundance data, there was an obvious demarcation in performance between the two regression-based methods (general linear models and generalized additive models), and the tree-based models. The boosted regression tree and random forest models out-performed the other models by a wide margin on both the training and testing data. However, there was a significant drop-off in performance for all models of invertebrate abundance (~50%) when moving from the training data to the testing data. Ensemble model performance was between the tree-based and regression-based methods. The maps of predictions from the models for both presence and abundance agreed very well across model types, with an increase in variability in predictions for the abundance data. We conclude that where data conforms well to the modeled distribution (such as the presence-absence data and binomial distribution in this study), the four types of models will provide similar results, although the regression-type models may be more consistent with biological theory. For data with highly zero-inflated distributions and nonnormal distributions such as the abundance data from this study, the tree-based methods performed better. Ensemble models that averaged predictions across the four model types, performed better than the GLM or GAM models but slightly poorer than the tree-based methods, suggesting ensemble models might be more robust to overfitting than tree methods, while mitigating some of the disadvantages in predictive performance of regression methods.
This grid displays mean predicted probability of presence of sea whips in the Gulf of Alaska.
Copyright Text: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Alaska Fisheries Science Center
Default Visibility: false
MaxRecordCount: 0
Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF
Min Scale: 0
Max Scale: 0
Supports Advanced Queries: false
Supports Statistics: false
Has Labels: false
Can Modify Layer: false
Can Scale Symbols: false
Use Standardized Queries: true
Supports Datum Transformation: true
Extent:
XMin: -1.843620899272939E7
YMin: 5657808.940117763
XMax: -1.4132208992729379E7
YMax: 9430408.940117763
Spatial Reference: 102100
(3857)
Drawing Info:
Advanced Query Capabilities:
Supports Statistics: false
Supports OrderBy: false
Supports Distinct: false
Supports Pagination: false
Supports TrueCurve: true
Supports Returning Query Extent: true
Supports Query With Distance: true
Supports Sql Expression: false
Supports Query With ResultType: false
Supports Returning Geometry Centroid: false
Supports Binning LOD: false
Supports Query With LOD Spatial Reference: false
HasZ: false
HasM: false
Has Attachments: false
HTML Popup Type: esriServerHTMLPopupTypeNone
Type ID Field: null
Fields:
None
Supported Operations:
Query
Query Attachments
Query Analytic
Generate Renderer
Return Updates
Iteminfo
Thumbnail
Metadata